- From: Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 16:41:06 -0400
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Onwards to tests, implementation reports, and fun goodies like that. hope to see everyone (modulo Elias, Chimezie, and Jeen) tomorrow. If anyone has input on the points below, email discussion before and after the telecon is always in order :) Lee Note: The meeting is still at 14:30 UTC. Please make sure to check that you're attending at the right time: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=5&day=22&year=2007&hour=14&min=30&sec=0&p1=0 :-). 0. Convene [1]RDF Data Access WG meeting of Tuesday, 15 May 2007 at 14:30:00 UTC + LeeF chairing + teleconference bridge: tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152 code:7333 Note that Zakim is back up and running, so we'll be using it for our telecon. + on irc at: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg + Scribe: @@ + Regrets: EliasT, Chimezie, Jeen + roll call + approve + 1 May minutes [2] + 8 May minutes [3] + 15 May minutes [4] + next meeting 29 May. @@ recruit scribe + agenda comments? 1. Review ACTION Items These actions appear DONE: Let's check on the status of the following actions: ACTION: ericP to poke IETF folks about registering SPARQL media types (esp. application/sparql-query) ACTION: EricP to run the yacker tool over and annotate the existing tests ACTION: ericP to get in touch with SteveH re: setting up an environment to generate an Overview page for tests in data-r2 a la http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/ ACTION: ericP, jeen, or LeeF to update http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/README with info on possible results format and on changes to manifest and test vocabularies ACTION: ericP to write a test showing that langMatches doens't do extended matching ACTION: LeeF to add `chimezie's leading digit test to the test suite ACTION: LeeF to remember that the wee, lost filter tests should be put [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/06-dawg-minutes.html#action05] ACTION: LeeF to mark the 4 regex tests approved 2. CR publication status (From Lee.) 3. XML and JSON Results Format publication status (From Eric.) 4. Implementation report Discussions of EARL and alternatives; consensus was that we should try to use EARL for implementation report. + http://www.w3.org/2006/12/19-dawg-minutes#item05 + http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JanMar/att-0005/simon-RDF_DAWG_Weekly_--_2_Jan_2007.html#item03 Our CR exit criteria is to have two implementations of each feature. + Eric has a tool that identifies "features" as parts of the grammar. Eric: how much manual massaging of the resulting list of features needs to be done? + Similarly, Eric can classify existing tests as to which features they cover. Is there a way to produce a summarized view of the coverage of our test suite? + We'd like to capture implementations results as EARL. Can someone produce an example of this output? Do we require implementations to produce the EARL output, or will we take other formats and generate the EARL ourselves? + How do we want to visually represent the implementation report? 5. Testing 5a. Query Language Let's keep moving tests over and approve them, hopefully in conjunction with monitoring test coverage. 5b. Protocol Elias sends his regrets, but says that protocol testing is on his radar. Let's find out if anyone else is interested in working with him on that. [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ [2] http://www.w3.org/2007/05/01-dawg-minutes.html [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007AprJun/att-0045/08-dawg-minutes.html [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007AprJun/att-0056/15-dawg-minutes.html
Received on Monday, 21 May 2007 20:41:24 UTC