See also: IRC log
What's your feelings on advancing to CR?
<SteveH> go for it :)
meet again next week, 22 May
focus on testing and implementation report during telecons going forward
ericP and AndyS - no more editorial changes, ready to move forward to CR
SimonR: still wants to figure out the OPTIONALs in predicate calculus issue, will explore during testing
LeeF I have mail from the following people, who all support advancing to CR
scribe: Souri
... Jeen
... Elias
... PatH
... plus SteveH on IRC
<ericP> http://www.w3.org/2005/01/yacker/uploads/SPARQL
<AndyS> http://www.w3.org/2005/01/yacker?name=SPARQL&replace=1&lang=perl
<AndyS> http://www.w3.org/2005/01/yacker/uploads/SPARQL/bnf
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/parsers/sparql.bnf
PROPOSED: To request transition of http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/rq25.html v1.100 plus parsers/sparql.bnf v1.2 to CR, modulo pubrules changes
AndyS: seconded
RESOLVED, no abstentions or objections
RESOLUTION: To request transition of http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/rq25.html v1.100 plus parsers/sparql.bnf v1.2 to CR, modulo pubrules changes
<scribe> ACTION: ericP to poke IETF folks about registering SPARQL media types (esp. application/sparql-query) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/05/15-dawg-minutes.html#action01]
(LeeF goes over CR transition request)
(EricP agrees to put rq25 through pubrules checks)