- From: Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 17:59:12 -0400
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Note: The meeting is still at 14:30 UTC. Please make sure to check that you're attending at the right time: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=4&day=10&year=2007&hour=14&min=30&sec=0&p1=0 :-). 0. Convene [1]RDF Data Access WG meeting of Tuesday, 17 April 2007 at 14:30:00 UTC + LeeF chairing + teleconference bridge: tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152 code:7333 Note that Zakim is back up and running, so we'll be using it for our telecon. + on irc at: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg + Scribe: @@ + Regrets: AndyS + roll call + approve 10 Apr minutes [2] + next meeting 24 Apr. @@ recruit scribe + agenda comments? 1. Review ACTION Items These actions appear DONE: ACTION: LeeF to mark the four tests in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007AprJun/0009.html approved ACTION: SimonR to respond to Chimezie noting no change and referencing the postponed cascaded queries and service description issues [ed: see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2007Apr/0006.html] Let's check on the status of the following actions: ACTION: EricP to run the yacker tool over and annotate the existing tests [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/06-dawg-minutes.html#action03] ACTION: ericP to get in touch with SteveH re: setting up an environment to generate an Overview page for tests in data-r2 a la http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/ [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/03-dawg-minutes#action10] ACTION: ericP, jeen, or LeeF to update http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/README with info on possible results format and on changes to manifest and test vocabularies [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/03-dawg-minutes#action09] ACTION: ericP to respond to Jeremy Carroll's comments re: langMatches ACTION: ericP to try running DanC's comment-tracking script(s) ACTION: LeeF or EliasT to reply to Bjoern regarding (not) POSTing application/sparql-query documents [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/06-dawg-minutes.html#action07] ACTION: LeeF to remember that the wee, lost filter tests should be put [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/06-dawg-minutes.html#action05] ACTION: jeen to go through and identify out-of-date tests that shouldn't be migrated to data-r2 (after ericP commits batch updates to tests) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/03-dawg-minutes#action12] ACTION: jeen to mark these 22 approved tests as approved [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/03-dawg-minutes#action07] 2. Last Call comment status [ed: I'd like to get DanC's comment-tracking stuff up and running. Until then, and while the comment load remains manageable, I'm keeping track of it here.] Open comments: 1/ Corby, Comments on SPARQL WD -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2007Mar/0008.html AndyS replies covering most of the comment -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2007Apr/0003.html Needs: + EricP's response about (11.4.10 RDFterm-equal about use of xsd:dateTime in the example) + Confirmation of satisfaction from commenter 3/ Ogbuji, No way to specify an RDF dataset of all the known named graphs -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2007Apr/0001.html Working group discussion: -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007AprJun/0003.html Working group response: -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2007Apr/0006.html Needs: + Confirmation of satisfaction from commenter 4/ Carroll, 11.4.12 langMatches -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2007Apr/0002.html Needs: + Group's response (EricP has an action on this) + Confirmation of satisfaction from commenter Closed Comments: 2/ Herman, minor editorial comments -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2007Apr/0000.html -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2007Apr/0005.html 3. Test suite There are four regex tests to approve referenced in this message: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007AprJun/0018.html 4. Towards CR SWCG advice on sufficient community review of LC. @@ [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007AprJun/att-0012/2007-04-10-dawg-minutes.html
Received on Monday, 16 April 2007 22:00:49 UTC