[CLOSED] Re: minor editorial comments [OK?]

Thank you Andy. The changes are perfect.

Ivan

Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> 
> 
> Ivan Herman wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> In 12.3.1: I was wondering whether, mathematically, it is not more
>> precise to say in the definition of the cardinality of mu that P(BGP) is
>> a subgraph of G. P = mu(sigma) is a mapping and not a (sub)graph
> 
> yes, I agree - I've changed the text to:
> 
> """
> card[Omega](mu) = card[Omega](number of distinct RDF instance mappings,
> sigma, such that P = mu(sigma) is a pattern instance mapping and P(BGP)
> is a subgraph of G)
> """
> 
>>
>> In 12.5: Evaluation of a graph pattern:
>>     Patten -> Pattern (in the title)
>>     In the first line, shouldn't it be eval(D(D[IRI]),P)?
>>     shouldn't it be OMEGA(?var->i) instead of OMEGA(?v->i)?
> 
> Corrected.
> 
>>
>> Ivan
> 
> These changes have been made to the editors' working draft:
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/rq25.html v1.81
> 
> I hope this message addresses your comments to your satisfaction.  If it
> does, please let us know by replying to this message to say so. If you
> change the line to include [CLOSED] it will help the scripts used for
> tracking comments.
> 
>     Andy
> 

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf