- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 10:57:17 +0000
- To: Jeen Broekstra <jeen.broekstra@aduna-software.com>
- CC: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Jeen Broekstra wrote: > > We're currently testing our new SPARQL parser/engine and ran into an > issue with the DAWG syntax test cases. > > According to > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/SyntaxFull/manifest.ttl , specifically DAWG-approved tests syntax-bnodes-03.rq and syntax-bnodes-04.rq, it is legal syntax to have blank node labels in the predicate position. (either [] or _:a). http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/SyntaxDev/ is the working copy based on the current grammar. (Dev, not Full) Full is (or rather "was") the version of the first full version of the syntax that the WG approved. > > However, in the current rq24 grammar there is no production rule for > this. > > I vaguely remember this being a topic for discussion but could not find > relevant mail in the archive (btw my firefox 2.0 seems to have some > trouble with navigating the mailinglist archive, anybody else having > problems?). > > So any idea what the current status is? Which is correct, the grammar or > the test case? The grammar. Those test cases are out of date and need maintenance. Andy > > Jeen
Received on Wednesday, 1 November 2006 10:57:36 UTC