Reviewing last call comment status, this one is (a) not connected to an open issue, (b) not just editorial, and (c) hasn't gotten much airtime. This request seems pretty reasonable: [[ There are at least two ways to trim the results back down with just syntax changes. The least intrusive change would be to just drop the <unbound> tag, and have it be implicit with <binding name=".."/>. More drastic is to just drop the entire <binding> tag when the variable is unbound, since the information can be retrieved from the head. ]] -- SPARQL Results Format and Unbound Variables http://www.w3.org/mid/42F4CEEB.5090306@umd.edu aka http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Aug/0043 So how about we make <binding> elements for unbound variables optional? -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29EReceived on Monday, 3 October 2005 22:19:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:00:37 UTC