- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 13:35:51 -0500
- To: andy.seaborne@hp.com
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 18:05 +0100, Seaborne, Andy wrote: > The Schedule of the Web Services Description Working Group is: > > Second Last Call / June 2005 > Candidate Recommendation / October 2005 > Proposed Recommendation / Early 2006 > > In feedback I have received from (HP) people who work more closely with the > current toolsets for WSDL than I do, it was noted that the change to supporting > WSDL 1.1 to include 2.0 is not necessary going to be fast or uniform. > > How hard would it be to add a non-normative translation to WSDL 1.1 just for the > SOAP form? Leaving all the procedural matters aside, ... I wrote some code to convert our WSDL 2.0 to WSDL 1.1 because the only tools I could find were WSDL 1.1 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/wsdldg.xsl I sent mail about it a while ago... wsdldg.xsl converts our WSDL 2.0 to WSDL 1.1; hunt for WSDL tools continues http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005AprJun/0075 > Are there features of WSDL 2.0 being used that preclude this? I didn't find any. > Andy > > > -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2005 18:35:58 UTC