propose to make syntax-qname-08-rq and syntax-qname-14-rq OBSOLETE

• From: <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
• Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 01:11:38 +0200
• To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
• Message-ID: <OFA394DDE6.B6962615-ONC125702D.007B1867-C125702D.007F6093@agfa.com>

I see that

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#syntax-qname-08-rq
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#syntax-qname-14-rq

are approved..
(must have missed that vote..)


I propose to make them OBSOLETE and change rq23 to either

[84]   NCCHAR   ::=   NCCHAR1 | '_' | '-' | [0-9] | #x00B7 |
                      [#x0300-#x036F] | [#x203F-#x2040]

i.e. disallow '.' in qname
and instead write absoluteized iris like
  <http://protege.stanford.edu/kb#Patient.confidentiality_cd>

or

[86]   NCNAME   ::=   ( "_" | NCCHAR1 ) NCCHAR* ( "_" | NCCHAR1 )

i.e. allow '.' in but not at-end-of qname
e.g.
  rim:Patient.confidentiality_cd


-- 
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/

Received on Monday, 27 June 2005 23:11:47 UTC