- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:31:31 -0500
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 12:37 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: > Briefly, for now... I can elaborate on request... > > <AndyS> Is http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/result2 the final > resting place (namespace) for the results? rq23 contains it in an > example - and a ref to the schema at > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/result2.xsd > <DanC> ew. > <DanC> no, I expect the namespace name to change to something > like /2005/sparqlres ok, so, Dave, how about http://www.w3.org/2005/sparqlres ? or http://www.w3.org/2005/06/sparqlres ? or .../sparqlResults ? To reserve the one with no /MM/ , I need to go up the chain a bit, per http://www.w3.org/1999/10/nsuri EricP or I can grab the YYYY/MM one at any time. And what do you want to put there? How about an XML Schema with <xs:annotation> stuff that points to the WD? and maybe a CSS stylesheet to give browsers a chance at rendering it? For change policy, I suggest we pick this one: Warning: Until the specification reaches W3C Candidate Recommendation (CR) status, this namespace name may be reused by any update in such a way as to cause documents written using the namespace to become invalid or to change in meaning. I still don't really know what's involved in making up WSDL namespaces. More on that separately. > <DanC> the WG should decide that. hmm... why is there no issue that > covers it? ugh. > <DanC> maybe I should have done this... or at least the namespace of our > WSDL foo... under wsdlAbstractProtocol > -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 24 June 2005 19:31:40 UTC