- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 13:51:12 +0100
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Dan Connolly wrote:
> On Jun 16, 2005, at 7:44 AM, Dan Connolly wrote:
>
>>On Jun 16, 2005, at 7:15 AM, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
>>
>>> In a group, all the group elements have to "pass" a solution for
>>>the groiup to match a solution.
>>
>>Ah... that's what I was missing. Thanks.
>>
>>http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#defn_GroupGraphPatter
>
>
> Hmm... what about this case?
>
> SELECT ?x WHERE { FILTER ( ?x < 10 ) }.
>
> That's got a bzillion solutions, right? Maybe we need a special case
> for that?
> Or maybe it's already syntactically illegal or something?
I think it depends on the evaluation of filter. As things stand, I read that as
an attempt to do "?x < 10" with no bound x hence false. That right, Eric?
Andy
See also:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Jun/0034.html
Received on Friday, 17 June 2005 12:53:03 UTC