Last Call duration and timing : (was: Agenda: RDF Data Access 14Jun)

• From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
• Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 12:04:35 +0100
• To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
• CC: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
• Message-ID: <42AEB9C3.9060906@hp.com>

Dan Connolly wrote:
. . .
> 3. Last call for SPARQL QL
> 
> Action AndyS: revise rq23 per fromUnionQuery decision
> 
> Discussion of review comments. Have the threads terminated? Has 
> consensus emerged? Are KC, JB, and SH satisfied? Are remaining todos 
> small/manageable?
> 
> Proposed: to publish sparql ql as a last call working draft; I.e. rq23 
> v1.xxx addresses plus changes to sections x, y, and z as agreed by [at 
> least 4 eyeballs]
> 
> Decision may or may not include last call duration. Chair would 
> appreciate advice in any case
> 
> Action ericp: arrange publication; work with danc on SOTD and last call 
> message to chairs
. . .

As for timing LC, I think it is important that there is a period (>= 2 weeks?) 
when all three documents are open for last call comments.

	Andy

Received on Tuesday, 14 June 2005 11:05:23 UTC