- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:56:03 +0100
- To: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- CC: DAWG public list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Done
Andy
Steve Harris wrote:
> Review of http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/ v1.379
>
> Section 10.1 on ORDER BY has:
>
> SELECT ?name
> WHERE { ?x foaf:name ?name ; :empId ?emp }
> ORDER BY DESC[?emp]
>
> But grammar has:
>
> [14] OrderClause ::= 'ORDER' 'BY' ( OrderCondition )+
>
> Suggestion to fix: replace []s with ()s in ORDER BY examples.
>
> - Steve
>
>
Received on Monday, 13 June 2005 12:58:57 UTC