- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:56:03 +0100
- To: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- CC: DAWG public list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Done Andy Steve Harris wrote: > Review of http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/ v1.379 > > Section 10.1 on ORDER BY has: > > SELECT ?name > WHERE { ?x foaf:name ?name ; :empId ?emp } > ORDER BY DESC[?emp] > > But grammar has: > > [14] OrderClause ::= 'ORDER' 'BY' ( OrderCondition )+ > > Suggestion to fix: replace []s with ()s in ORDER BY examples. > > - Steve > >
Received on Monday, 13 June 2005 12:58:57 UTC