- From: Jeen Broekstra <jeen@aduna.biz>
- Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 15:35:53 +0200
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
SPARQL language editor's draft rev 1.379
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/
Section 2.6
Last sentence:
"This is a simple, conjunctive graph pattern match, and all the
variables used in the query pattern muts [...]"
Spelling error, "muts" should be "must".
Section 2.7
In subsection "Blank Nodes and Queries"
I would like it to be made even more clear that the notion of blank
nodes in a query has _nothing_ to do with blank nodes in the data and
merely acts a (anonymous) variable. To that end I suggest adding the
following sentence:
"A blank node in a query pattern may match against any type of RDF
term."
Section 2.8
In subsection "Blank Nodes":
'The following two forms:
[ :p "v" ].
[] :p "v".
allocate a unique blank node (here "b57") and equivalent to writing:
_:b57 :p "v" '
This sentence is grammatically incorrect. Suggestion for rewording:
'The following three forms are equivalent:
[ :p "v" ] .
[] :p "v" .
_:b57 :p "v" .
The first two forms allocate a unique blank node to the subject of
the triple pattern. The third pattern allows sharing the blank node
across multiple triple patterns in the same query by using a blank
node identifier ("b57").'
Jeen
--
Jeen Broekstra Aduna BV
Knowledge Engineer Julianaplein 14b, 3817 CS Amersfoort
http://aduna.biz The Netherlands
tel. +31 33 46599877
Received on Thursday, 9 June 2005 13:37:10 UTC