- From: Jeen Broekstra <jeen@aduna.biz>
- Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 15:35:53 +0200
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
SPARQL language editor's draft rev 1.379 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/ Section 2.6 Last sentence: "This is a simple, conjunctive graph pattern match, and all the variables used in the query pattern muts [...]" Spelling error, "muts" should be "must". Section 2.7 In subsection "Blank Nodes and Queries" I would like it to be made even more clear that the notion of blank nodes in a query has _nothing_ to do with blank nodes in the data and merely acts a (anonymous) variable. To that end I suggest adding the following sentence: "A blank node in a query pattern may match against any type of RDF term." Section 2.8 In subsection "Blank Nodes": 'The following two forms: [ :p "v" ]. [] :p "v". allocate a unique blank node (here "b57") and equivalent to writing: _:b57 :p "v" ' This sentence is grammatically incorrect. Suggestion for rewording: 'The following three forms are equivalent: [ :p "v" ] . [] :p "v" . _:b57 :p "v" . The first two forms allocate a unique blank node to the subject of the triple pattern. The third pattern allows sharing the blank node across multiple triple patterns in the same query by using a blank node identifier ("b57").' Jeen -- Jeen Broekstra Aduna BV Knowledge Engineer Julianaplein 14b, 3817 CS Amersfoort http://aduna.biz The Netherlands tel. +31 33 46599877
Received on Thursday, 9 June 2005 13:37:10 UTC