- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 17:13:50 +0100
- To: "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>
- CC: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 03:51:19PM +0100, Seaborne, Andy wrote: > >> >> >>Dan Connolly wrote: >><snip/> >> >>>Also, Andy, can you take TimBL's comment >>>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2004Nov/0020.html >>> >>>and extract a test case that shows how the difference >>>between the 12 Oct design and what TimBL is asking for? >> >>In the Oct 12 design, expresses in current language, the default graph >>(Tim's >>default KB) is the RDF merge of the named graphs. >> >>Tim made two points: >> >>1/ There are many ways to create graphs - merge is just one of them. His >>example 0 show one that is the OWL closure of the merge. This seems quite >>timely again with possible rules work in the air. >> >>2/ That the default to believing (Tim's word) all RDF and the merge of the >>RDF >>is dangerous. The example 2 is FOAF based. >> >> >>Example 0: >> >>G1.ttl: >>:mary foaf:phone "1234" . >> >>G2.ttl >>:mary owl:sameAs :maryJ . >> >> >>then >> >> SELECT ?phone WHERE { :maryJ foaf:phone ?phone } >> >>gives :maryJ has phone "1234" yet no graph made this claim. G2 can >>injected by a third party. >> >>------------------------------ >> >>Suppose we have two graphs that have been got through crawling. One >>happens to >>be out of date but that's the nature of FOAF: >> >>Named graph <G1> >>_:x foaf:name "Alice" . >>_:x foaf:mbox <mailto:alice@example.org> . >>_:x diet:preference "Vegetarian" . >> >>Named graph <G2> >>_:y foaf:name "Alice" . >>_:y foaf:mbox <mailto:alice@example.org> . >>_:y diet:preference "Vegan" . >> >>Let's try checking dietary preferences: >> >>ASK { [ foaf:name "Alice" ; diet:preference "Vegan" ] } >> >>=> (Oct 12 design) Yes >> >>=> (Tim asks for) No > > > Calling them "named graphs" above somewhat pre-decides the answer. > I think it's interesting to compare the respective expressivities > of both languages. Both proposals allow you to ask either question. > > In Source (12-Oct) parlance: > > ASK > LOAD <G1> <G2> > WHERE { [ foaf:name "Alice" ; diet:preference "Vegan" ] } > => Yes > > ASK > LOAD <G1> <G2> > WHERE { GRAPH ?g { [ foaf:name "Alice" ; diet:preference "Vegan" ] } . > FILTER ?g != <G1> && ?g != <G2> } > => No These two examples have changed the test slightly: one key point is that the query: ASK { [ foaf:name "Alice" ; diet:preference "Vegan" ] } does have any FROM/LOAD whatever. It is a straight question of the published dataset. As Yoshio point out: http://www.w3.org/2005/Talks/0511-keynote-tbl/ slide 3 The forms you show have the application set up the dataset and the publisher is neutral party. Andy > > and in Name Graphs parlance: > > ASK > LOAD <G1> <G2> > WHERE { [ foaf:name "Alice" ; diet:preference "Vegan" ] } > => Yes > > ASK > LOAD INTO <G1> <G2> > WHERE { GRAPH ?g { [ foaf:name "Alice" ; diet:preference "Vegan" ] } } > => No > > >>Tim as asking that this return nothing unless the publisher has decided to >>put that information in the default graph. The publisher is to be made >>responsible for claims in the default graph just like a plain graph and >>HTTP GET. >> >> Andy > > > That's a very interesting point. In Source, the querier needs to be > able to specify a trust domain, maybe by enumerating a specific set > of inclusions or exclusions, or maybe something more complicated > involving data in some trusted document and some logical connection > expressible in a FILTER. > > The effect of having a LOAD INTO that specifically does *not* affect > the default graph (contrary to my aggregator needs), is that queriers > that use no LOAD directives get a default graph that could have some > sort of endorsed status. By default, the user is basically protected > from the data that they loaded, whereas in Source, they would have to > specifically enumerate certain documents in or out. > > Tim's use case was pretty sketchy; I'm curious about practical use > cases of this (the use cases that I have experience with don't need > it). Maybe social environment is part of these use cases. > > >><snip/> > >
Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2005 16:18:07 UTC