- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 11:52:09 +0100
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Dan Connolly wrote: <snip/> > 8. Last Call schedule > > old plan: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005AprJun/0219.html > > May 31 for a WG candidate for last call for SPARQL/Q > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/ v 1.363 of 2005/05/30 > > (taking a scan, I don't think we're finished with > my comments on > - URI/IRI (I still see "the subject, which is an RDF URI reference") > - definitions, esp constraint (more on that separately) > - references > perhaps those can be addressed in parallel with other reviews > ) > > 2 weeks later for a WG candidate for SPARQL/P > > We will be looking for at least two reviewers for each docuemnt. What will be the process for WG review? It might be useful to be more formal about issue tracking - we have to have a process for LC anyway. One email message - many issues may not be the best way forward. For LC, some groups are using Bugzilla. Has that gone well? <snip/> Andy
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2005 10:52:36 UTC