Re: toward HTTP traces for SPARQL (fromUnionQuery, CONSTRUCT)

On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 05:27:16PM -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:

> But after looking at that design and the
> "here's mine in a screenful..."
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005AprJun/0054.html
> 
> I prefer &data=... to &default-graph-uri=...

You mean you prefer the parameter name "data" to the parameter name
"default-graph-uri"?

(Hence my skepticism when anyone says "the names don't matter"...!)

Kendall Clark

Received on Thursday, 5 May 2005 23:04:13 UTC