- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 07:34:16 -0500
- To: andy.seaborne@hp.com
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 12:08 +0100, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> Dan Connolly wrote:
> ...
> >
> > hmm... why is [] no good? sparqler complains about...
> > select ?R where
> > { ?R [] [].
> > }
> >
> > I have only matched things that occur in the subject position.
> ....
>
> bNodes are not currently allowed in the property position beause RDF doesn't
> allow them there. Maybe in queries (as variables) they should be.
Ah yes. I think I realized that after I sent the question.
It's a bit odd that
{ ?R ?dummy [] }
is allowed, and means the same thing, but { ?R [] [] } is
not allowed.
> Turtle does not allow bNodes in the property slot. Comments?
I don't really have strong feelings either way. I'm happy for
the editors to flip a coin (or leave the coin flipped).
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 12 April 2005 12:34:19 UTC