- From: Jeen Broekstra <jeen@aduna.biz>
- Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 10:14:47 +0200
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Dan Connolly wrote: > On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 12:46 +0200, Jeen Broekstra wrote: > >>On Apr 6, 2005, at 12:07 AM, Dan Connolly wrote: >> >>>A comment asks... >>>"How many of the 14 test questions in [1] does the current SPARQL spec >>>cover ?" >>> -- >>>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Apr/0005.html >>> -> http://www.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/WBS/pha/rdf-query/ >>> >>>I'm interested to take a crack at it, but I'd like some confirmation >>>from other WG members that I've got this right before I reply. >>>Perhaps it's worth making these into test cases... >> >>I am one of the co-authors of that report, so if I can help out in any >>way let me know. > > > I think it would be great for you to add these cases to our test > suite. > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/ > > If you're interested, send an ssh2 public key to EricP and me > and we'll try to arrange CVS write access. I presume you can > get in touch with Steve to learn anything you don't yet know > about how our test suite works. Alright, I'll give it a go. [comments on closed-world assumption, quantification and counting objects] I'm taking this as input for the test cases on that report as well. We need to formulate some of these cases a bit sharper, apparently. Jeen -- Jeen Broekstra Aduna BV Knowledge Engineer Julianaplein 14b, 3817 CS Amersfoort http://aduna.biz The Netherlands tel. +31 33 46599877
Received on Friday, 8 April 2005 08:12:59 UTC