- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
- Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:25:11 -0400
- To: DAWG Mailing List <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#GraphPatternMatching I find the example: SELECT ?x ?v WHERE ( ?x ?x ?v ) against rdf:type rdf:type rdf:Property . and rdfs:seeAlso rdf:type rdf:Property . To be a bit abstruse, involving reflection on the rdf syntax. Perhaps the following would do just as well, and be more in the spirit of the other examples: SELECT ?x ?v WHERE ( ?x ?v ?x) against: :bob ns:loves :bob and :bob ns:loves :mary (Actually, I don't know how this query would behave/ought to behave in the presense of equivalentTos and other OWLisms) In any case, something a bit more concrete seems to be in order. Actually, you could just have SELECT ?x ?v WHERE ( ?x foaf:knows :mary) against :bob foaf:knows :mary. and :bob foaf:knows :george. or :bob dc:creator "Foo". I really think this example should be as simple and concrete as possible. Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Monday, 4 April 2005 20:25:12 UTC