- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:23:08 -0500
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2004 22:23:07 UTC
On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 06:23, Seaborne, Andy wrote: > Attached is a revised set of tests that I have changed to be in be in > the current syntax. Has anybody else tried these? EricP, I'd like to see the WG resolve to adopt these tests in the upcoming telcon. That reminds me... there were various loose ends w.r.t. our discussion of these tests at the ftf meeting... http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf3-brs#core-defs I didn't put it on last week's agenda in part because nobody in particular took the action. I see that Steve has developed some tests... http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~swh/source-tests/ but you guys don't seem to be working in the shared CVS repository. Is there any paritcular reason for that? Anything that EricP or I can fix? It's more convenient, for me, to browse in http space than to unpack zip files. And if Steve put his tests in the shared repository, EricP could fix any bugs he found. I don't have any critical need for this stuff to be in the shared space rooted at http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/ yet, but ideally I'd like that shared space to be useful to developers who come looking at our stuff in response to the upcoming publication as a WD. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2004 22:23:07 UTC