- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:54:32 -0500
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Cc: 'RDF Data Access Working Group' <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2004 20:54:31 UTC
Umm... when you forward these, ideally, I'd like to see a proposed reply... or at least some thoughts of your own on the matter. The raw bits are already available to the WG, just a few clicks from the WG homepage. Are you persuaded to remove FROM by his comments? Based on my implementation experience, I think I wouldn't miss it, but I haven't thought it thru carefully. On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 15:46, Seaborne, Andy wrote: > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: FROM keyword unnecessary? > Resent-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:06:22 +0000 > Resent-From: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:42:46 +0000 > From: Phil Dawes <pdawes@users.sourceforge.net> > To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > > > Hi Andy, Hi Dawg comments > > I'm struggling to see the value of having the 'FROM' functionality in > the query language, even in the local case. [...] -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2004 20:54:31 UTC