- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 03:52:50 -0400
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <20040927075249.GK20897@w3.org>
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 12:02:05PM +0100, Steve Harris wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 11:43:19 +0100, Dave Beckett wrote: > > I think I guess this is time to propose an alternative since the > > abutting of SOURCE ?src near a triple isn't working as far as clarity > > goes. This is because that in > > SOURCE ?src (?x ?y ?z) > > users are unsure if SOURCE ?src is part of the () following or > > previous. One simple approach is to move the term in the triple: > > > > (?x ?y ?z SOURCE ?src) > > I quite like that form, its clear what SOURCE refers too. +1 > > which could be used like > > (?x ?y ?z)->foo:bar(1) > > > > where 'source' is a standard name. > > This uses a bit too much line-noise for my tastes. > > - Steve -- -eric office: +81.466.49.1170 W3C, Keio Research Institute at SFC, Shonan Fujisawa Campus, Keio University, 5322 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-8520 JAPAN +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA cell: +1.857.222.5741 (does not work in Asia) (eric@w3.org) Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than email address distribution.
Received on Monday, 27 September 2004 07:52:51 UTC