- From: Alberto Reggiori <alberto@asemantics.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 15:33:58 +0200
- To: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On Aug 31, 2004, at 12:51 PM, Seaborne, Andy wrote: >> yes it makes sense - but I then do not understand why we need to make >> the syntax so much N3 like, using PREFIX and use :prefix notation >> instead of current RDQL USING prefix FOR <URI> > > RDQL syntax can't handle the default prefix. true - I did not think about that one cheers Alberto
Received on Tuesday, 31 August 2004 13:34:09 UTC