Re: Syntax modifications

On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 11:51:57AM +0100, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> 
> > yes it makes sense - but I then do not understand why we need to make
> > the syntax so much N3 like, using PREFIX and use :prefix notation
> > instead of current RDQL USING prefix FOR <URI>
> 
> RDQL syntax can't handle the default prefix.

How about ommiting the FOR for the default?

USING <http://my.default.prefix>,
      ex FOR <http://example.com/>

- Steve

Received on Tuesday, 31 August 2004 13:30:46 UTC