- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:28:40 +0100
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 06:37:58 +0100, Andy Seaborne wrote: > My next example (3) then highlights an interaction of SOURCE and inference > if we attempt to use the natural result from case 2. Others advocate that > SOURCE reflect the origin graph in the aggregation. What if it can arise > across the aggregations? Are we saying that inference *can't* be done in > this case? I havent seen anyone else argue for inferred triples being the the graph of one of the ground triples that lead to the inference. It seems like an odd decision. If you place inferred triples in another SOURCE/graph (which seems reasonable to me) then these problems go away. - Steve
Received on Friday, 27 August 2004 09:28:44 UTC