agenda: RDF Data Access 17 Aug 2004

1. Convene, take roll, review record, agenda

  RDF Data Access Working Group
  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
  Tuesday 2004-08-17 14:30 UTC
  Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 7333 ("RDFD")
  http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#s_1343
  supplementary chat: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
       log to appear: http://www.w3.org/2004/07/27-dawg-irc

Scribe: EricP? volunteer?

roll call; cf http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/#who
 regrets: AndyS, YoshioF, DaveB?
	Kendall Clark, Jos De Roo, Eric Prud'hommeaux?


PROPOSED: to ammend
 Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2004-07-20 for review
 Tue, 20 Jul 2004 12:30:58 -0700
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0151.html
to show DanC's action to follow up on 2004JulSep/0129 as done
and then accept it as a true record.


note next meeting: 23 Aug. Scribe volunteer?
  regrets YoshioF

Unless anybody has any progress to report, let's continue
these without discussion:


ACTION EricP: find out the schedule of the 2005 W3C tech plenary and
 inform the WG so that we can plan ftf meetings after September.

ACTION: JimH, to work with Bijan to do some sort of UDDI/Web services
  use case

ACTION: RobS write email to Farrukh about traversing a taxonomy, continues.

ACTION SimonR: continue discussing and promoting union query for UC4.5

ACTION Simon+Kendall elaborate the rel. of rules and "construct" in the
  UC&R doc.

ACTION: TomA: draft replies to Chris Wilper and Bjoerern Hoehrmann
  and send the drafts to the WG mailing list.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2004Jul/0000.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2004Jun/0004.html

agenda ammendments?



2. SOURCE, "provenance"/data-management"


ACTION DanC: explain evolution of log:semantics/log:includes from
  uri-is-graph to uri-is-doc in cwm, to inform discussion of SOURCE

ACTION DaveB: explain the main uses seen for redland contexts with
  respect to the provenance

ACTION DaveB: propose an way to address the SOURCE issue

cf
  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#i_sourceImplExp
  $Revision: 1.25 $ of $Date: 2004/08/16 12:23:00 $

hm... any relevant tests?
 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/


3. Collections

ACTION AndyS: write about the querying collections and
  returning collections issues
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0202.html

cf
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#i_collections
$Revision: 1.25 $ of $Date: 2004/08/16 12:23:00 $


4. Reporting b-nodes

ACTION SimonR: write about the "returning bnodes from a query" issue

cf
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#i_bnodes


5. XQuery integration requirements/objective

ACTION SimonR: write a document discussing tradeoffs with adapting
  XQuery as an RDF query language for discussion thru the September
  meeting in Bristol.
(ref http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf2#xqfa )

ACTION DanC: notify Semantic Web CG of risks around the "1.5
  Relationship with XQuery" scope of our charter.
done. see also:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2004Aug/0004.html


6. review "Semantic Interpretation for Speech Recognition"?

cf
 queries in "Semantic Interpretation for Speech Recognition"? 
 Dan Connolly (Wednesday, 28 July)
 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0219.html


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Monday, 16 August 2004 15:20:34 UTC