- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 10:20:56 -0500
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
1. Convene, take roll, review record, agenda RDF Data Access Working Group http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ Tuesday 2004-08-17 14:30 UTC Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 7333 ("RDFD") http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#s_1343 supplementary chat: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg log to appear: http://www.w3.org/2004/07/27-dawg-irc Scribe: EricP? volunteer? roll call; cf http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/#who regrets: AndyS, YoshioF, DaveB? Kendall Clark, Jos De Roo, Eric Prud'hommeaux? PROPOSED: to ammend Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2004-07-20 for review Tue, 20 Jul 2004 12:30:58 -0700 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0151.html to show DanC's action to follow up on 2004JulSep/0129 as done and then accept it as a true record. note next meeting: 23 Aug. Scribe volunteer? regrets YoshioF Unless anybody has any progress to report, let's continue these without discussion: ACTION EricP: find out the schedule of the 2005 W3C tech plenary and inform the WG so that we can plan ftf meetings after September. ACTION: JimH, to work with Bijan to do some sort of UDDI/Web services use case ACTION: RobS write email to Farrukh about traversing a taxonomy, continues. ACTION SimonR: continue discussing and promoting union query for UC4.5 ACTION Simon+Kendall elaborate the rel. of rules and "construct" in the UC&R doc. ACTION: TomA: draft replies to Chris Wilper and Bjoerern Hoehrmann and send the drafts to the WG mailing list. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2004Jul/0000.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2004Jun/0004.html agenda ammendments? 2. SOURCE, "provenance"/data-management" ACTION DanC: explain evolution of log:semantics/log:includes from uri-is-graph to uri-is-doc in cwm, to inform discussion of SOURCE ACTION DaveB: explain the main uses seen for redland contexts with respect to the provenance ACTION DaveB: propose an way to address the SOURCE issue cf http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#i_sourceImplExp $Revision: 1.25 $ of $Date: 2004/08/16 12:23:00 $ hm... any relevant tests? http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/ 3. Collections ACTION AndyS: write about the querying collections and returning collections issues http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0202.html cf http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#i_collections $Revision: 1.25 $ of $Date: 2004/08/16 12:23:00 $ 4. Reporting b-nodes ACTION SimonR: write about the "returning bnodes from a query" issue cf http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#i_bnodes 5. XQuery integration requirements/objective ACTION SimonR: write a document discussing tradeoffs with adapting XQuery as an RDF query language for discussion thru the September meeting in Bristol. (ref http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf2#xqfa ) ACTION DanC: notify Semantic Web CG of risks around the "1.5 Relationship with XQuery" scope of our charter. done. see also: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2004Aug/0004.html 6. review "Semantic Interpretation for Speech Recognition"? cf queries in "Semantic Interpretation for Speech Recognition"? Dan Connolly (Wednesday, 28 July) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0219.html -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 16 August 2004 15:20:34 UTC