- From: Alberto Reggiori <alberto@asemantics.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:45:13 +0200
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
sorry my regrets also for tomorrow telecon - some important parents' problems to take care of Alberto On Jul 26, 2004, at 5:34 PM, Dan Connolly wrote: > > 1. Convene, take roll, review record, agenda > > RDF Data Access Working Group > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ > Tuesday 2004-07-27 14:30 UTC > Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 7333 ("RDFD") > http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#s_1343 > supplementary chat: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg > log to appear: http://www.w3.org/2004/07/27-dawg-irc > > Scribe: Dave Beckett > > roll call. > > PROPOSED: to accept > Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2004-07-20 for review > Tue, 20 Jul 2004 12:30:58 -0700 > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/ > 0151.html > as a true record. > > note next meeting: 2 Aug. Scribe volunteer? > > I propose to continue this without discussion: > > ACTION EricP: find out the schedule of the 2005 W3C tech plenary and > inform the WG so that we can plan ftf meetings after September. > > and to note this as DONE without discussion: > > ACTION DanC: follow up to > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/ > 0129.html > > agenda ammendments? > > > 2. Test development/maintenance > > ACTION Jos: discuss test suite documentation and maintenance with > Steve, > EricP, AndyS, ... > some progres... > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/ > 0165.html > > > > 3. Web Services Directory use cases > > ACTION: JimH, to work with Bijan to do some sort of UDDI/Web services > use case > > ACTION: RobS write email to Farrukh about traversing a taxonomy, > continues. > > > 4. Toward updated Use Cases and Requirements publication > > > ACTION Kendall: remove 4.4 User-specifiable Serialization > > ACTION KendallC: draft revision, toward updating our public WD, > delivery > ~next wed. > > hmm... I don't see much progress: > > RDF Data Access Use Cases and Requirements > Live Draft ($Revision: 1.123 $ of $Date: 2004/06/21 15:50:39 $) > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/UseCases > > ACTION: RobS to review the document when complete. > > ACTION Simon+Kendall elaborate the rel. of rules and "construct" in the > UC&R doc. > > ACTION SimonR: offer a replacement for 4.5 focussed on union query. > > ACTION ericP: send federation use case motivating premises (in Algae) > > ACTION: TomA draft a reply to Chris Wilper and send draft to WG > mailing list. > > > 5. SOURCE, "provenance"/data-management > > cf thread 4.2 : Change "provenance" to "data management" > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/ > thread.html#117 > > The discussion of the objective doesn't seem to have converged, but > meanwhile, some test cases sprung up, related to SOURCE. > We also have: > > ACTION Jos: explain log:includes to inform the discussion of SOURCE > (nee > provenance) > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/ > 0164.html > > ACTION DanC: explain evolution of log:semantics/log:includes from > uri-is-graph to uri-is-doc in cwm, to inform discussion of SOURCE > > ACTION DaveB: explain the main uses seen for redland contexts with > respect to the provenance > > > 6. Issue: DESCRIBE > > ACTION AndyS: explain DESCRIBE design implicit in BRQL spec. > seems done... > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/ > 0144.html > > (hmm... there's no issue marker in the "DESCRIBE" section of > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/ > $Revision: 1.1 $ of $Date: 2004/07/20 15:21:02 $ > but I thought we raised one. I can't confirm from the ftf records, > though). > > > 7. XQuery integration requirements/objective > > ACTION SimonR: write a document discussing tradeoffs with adapting > XQuery as an RDF query language for discussion thru the September > meeting in Bristol. > > ACTION DanC: notify Semantic Web CG of risks around the "1.5 > Relationship with XQuery" scope of our charter. > > This seems relevant: > Updated doc: Extracting information from RDF for XML processing > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/ > 0160.html > > > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ >
Received on Monday, 26 July 2004 15:45:56 UTC