- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:34:19 -0500
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
1. Convene, take roll, review record, agenda RDF Data Access Working Group http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ Tuesday 2004-07-27 14:30 UTC Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 7333 ("RDFD") http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#s_1343 supplementary chat: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg log to appear: http://www.w3.org/2004/07/27-dawg-irc Scribe: Dave Beckett roll call. PROPOSED: to accept Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2004-07-20 for review Tue, 20 Jul 2004 12:30:58 -0700 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0151.html as a true record. note next meeting: 2 Aug. Scribe volunteer? I propose to continue this without discussion: ACTION EricP: find out the schedule of the 2005 W3C tech plenary and inform the WG so that we can plan ftf meetings after September. and to note this as DONE without discussion: ACTION DanC: follow up to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0129.html agenda ammendments? 2. Test development/maintenance ACTION Jos: discuss test suite documentation and maintenance with Steve, EricP, AndyS, ... some progres... http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0165.html 3. Web Services Directory use cases ACTION: JimH, to work with Bijan to do some sort of UDDI/Web services use case ACTION: RobS write email to Farrukh about traversing a taxonomy, continues. 4. Toward updated Use Cases and Requirements publication ACTION Kendall: remove 4.4 User-specifiable Serialization ACTION KendallC: draft revision, toward updating our public WD, delivery ~next wed. hmm... I don't see much progress: RDF Data Access Use Cases and Requirements Live Draft ($Revision: 1.123 $ of $Date: 2004/06/21 15:50:39 $) http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/UseCases ACTION: RobS to review the document when complete. ACTION Simon+Kendall elaborate the rel. of rules and "construct" in the UC&R doc. ACTION SimonR: offer a replacement for 4.5 focussed on union query. ACTION ericP: send federation use case motivating premises (in Algae) ACTION: TomA draft a reply to Chris Wilper and send draft to WG mailing list. 5. SOURCE, "provenance"/data-management cf thread 4.2 : Change "provenance" to "data management" http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/thread.html#117 The discussion of the objective doesn't seem to have converged, but meanwhile, some test cases sprung up, related to SOURCE. We also have: ACTION Jos: explain log:includes to inform the discussion of SOURCE (nee provenance) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0164.html ACTION DanC: explain evolution of log:semantics/log:includes from uri-is-graph to uri-is-doc in cwm, to inform discussion of SOURCE ACTION DaveB: explain the main uses seen for redland contexts with respect to the provenance 6. Issue: DESCRIBE ACTION AndyS: explain DESCRIBE design implicit in BRQL spec. seems done... http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0144.html (hmm... there's no issue marker in the "DESCRIBE" section of http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/ $Revision: 1.1 $ of $Date: 2004/07/20 15:21:02 $ but I thought we raised one. I can't confirm from the ftf records, though). 7. XQuery integration requirements/objective ACTION SimonR: write a document discussing tradeoffs with adapting XQuery as an RDF query language for discussion thru the September meeting in Bristol. ACTION DanC: notify Semantic Web CG of risks around the "1.5 Relationship with XQuery" scope of our charter. This seems relevant: Updated doc: Extracting information from RDF for XML processing http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0160.html -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 26 July 2004 11:34:40 UTC