- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 21:26:14 +0100
- To: "'RDF Data Access Working Group'" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 07:41:39 +0100, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > SELECT ?s, ?src > > WHERE (?s ?p ?o) SOURCE ?src > > > > +-------+-------+ > > | ?s | ?src | > > +-------+-------+ > > | :foo | a.rdf | > > | :bar | b.rdf | > > +-------+-------+ > > I would have expected > > +-------+-------+ > | ?s | ?src | > +-------+-------+ > | :foo | a.rdf | > | :foo | a.rdf | > | :bar | b.rdf | > +-------+-------+ > > without a DISTINCT being added to the query. Yes, you're right. By way of an excuse, these were adapted from my RDQL tests, and 3store implicitly DISTINCTs. - Steve
Received on Tuesday, 20 July 2004 16:26:19 UTC