- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 08:21:28 -0400
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Folks, I put together a bit of RDF (a few hundred assertions, as I recall) representing our evaluations of initial query language and protocol designs. I'll be keeping it updated as or if new evaluations come in. I'm having some troubles with W3's CVS, but those should be tamed eventually -- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/design-eval.rdf http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/design-eval.n3 I made up a namespace for the WG and for the UCR doc, as well as some predicates in each namespace. Yes, there are several other ways I could have done this RDF, including using a bag for the requirements and design objectives, but -shrug-. I also coined a TAG URI to identify the designs we evaluated (since I wasn't sure they all had stable "home pages", and I don't like the "home page stands for foo" idiom much). Ping me or ask on-list if something is wrong or unclear. I validated the resulting RDF but that's about all I'll warrant for these files. Best, Kendall Clark -- Sometimes it's appropriate, even patriotic, to be ashamed of your country. -- James Howard Kunstler
Received on Wednesday, 7 July 2004 08:21:43 UTC