- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 08:30:27 -0600
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I see quite a bit of discussion of technical issues. I have tried not to encourage it, in hopes that we'd get our use cases done first. But it continues anyway. I don't want to decide any of them until we have a better feel for use cases and requirements. But I don't want the same threads to start over and over either. I'm willing to work with an issues list maintainer to keep an orderly list of "yes, we'll get to that eventually" promises. Any volunteers? by way of precedent/example, I'm pretty partial to the WebOnt issues list... http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/webont-issues.html it was maintained more or less by hand by Mike Smith. I think he had some emacs macros. I occasionally fixed a link or tidied it up a bit. Some groups use fancy tools and such. I require that I be able to edit XHTML, so the maintainer needs to be able to at least look at the diffs of my edits and feed them back into whatever content mismanagement system or whatever. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ see you at the WWW2004 in NY 17-22 May?
Received on Tuesday, 30 March 2004 09:30:23 UTC