- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:06:51 -0500
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 09:44:04AM +0200, Patrick Stickler wrote: > > > This is a nice specialization of the more generically stated use cases > > PS-1: Discovery of authoritative knowledge via URI > PS-3: Third-Party Knowledge Discovery; query by known identity > > which apply to any resource whatsoever denoted by a URI, such as > a web service. I think so, yes; though I reserve the right to change my mind after actually thinking about it. :> > Thus, if the client software knows the URI of the web service in > question, it can then (hopefully) use the DAWG solution to obtain > a description of that web service, and decide how best (or if) to > interact with that service. Yes. > "Negotiation" is taken to equate to the client learning what > protocols, query languages, parameters, etc. the server supports > and deciding for itself how best (or if) to proceed. Exactly; and, though I guess this is already clear, I want clients to be able to "learn" these things via RDF. (This is why I'm trying to analogize to con-neg, though this is really more like capability negotiation.) The only diff in my use case and yr 1 & 3 is that I think DAWG will have to -- and this takes us beyond *use cases* strictly speaking -- work out some actual RDF vocabulary and conventions. (I should look at the capabilities stuff the W3 has already done, of course; but first I wanna finish writing more UCs.) Kendall
Received on Friday, 19 March 2004 09:08:26 UTC