Re: thoughts and some refs about AFS-2 UC

On Mar 18, 2004, at 18:30, ext Alberto Reggiori wrote:

> ... To tackle the provenance aspect/problem instead, I would expect 
> such systems to explicitly flag/annotate their CBDs with some 
> authoritative information about the source providing the the answer. 
> Even so, it is not clear to me how today solutions like Joseki/URIQA 
> solves this problem though.
> Any thoughts about this?

Jeremy Carroll, Chris Bizer, Pat Hayes, and I have been working on an 
to address such issues -- concerning named graphs, signatures, and 
We are working to get a paper completed.

To properly address such concerns, you have to (in our opinion) add a 
little bit
of extra machinery and augment the RDF MT -- so given the presumption 
that what
the DAWG comes up with should sync with the latest RDF/OWL specs, that 
could put
it out of scope.



Patrick Stickler
Nokia, Finland

Received on Friday, 19 March 2004 02:57:28 UTC