- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:57:10 +0200
- To: "ext Alberto Reggiori" <alberto@asemantics.com>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Mar 18, 2004, at 18:30, ext Alberto Reggiori wrote: > ... To tackle the provenance aspect/problem instead, I would expect > such systems to explicitly flag/annotate their CBDs with some > authoritative information about the source providing the the answer. > Even so, it is not clear to me how today solutions like Joseki/URIQA > solves this problem though. > > Any thoughts about this? Jeremy Carroll, Chris Bizer, Pat Hayes, and I have been working on an approach to address such issues -- concerning named graphs, signatures, and authentication. We are working to get a paper completed. To properly address such concerns, you have to (in our opinion) add a little bit of extra machinery and augment the RDF MT -- so given the presumption that what the DAWG comes up with should sync with the latest RDF/OWL specs, that could put it out of scope. Patrick -- Patrick Stickler Nokia, Finland patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Friday, 19 March 2004 02:57:28 UTC