- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:54:53 -0600
- To: Alberto Reggiori <alberto@asemantics.com>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Thanks for carrying the ball forward on this topic and for the timely follow-up on your action item. But please consider the subject of this message from the perspective of somebody joining the WG 6 months from now and scanning the archive. It's totally opaque. Reading the rest of the message, I struggle to find anything other than technical jargon to use as a topic for this discussion. "information discovery", "optional properties", "Joseki RDF Net API/protocol", URIQA, MGET, "TAP GetData" ... The references to the implementation experience are very helpful, but can you relate these technical terms to some business sectors, like publishing/syndication, multimedia asset management or the like? even something really broad like enterprise integration would be help. Going back to the message of Thu, 11 Mar 2004 17:15:17 -0000 that started this thread, I see that the use case involved somebody doing journalistic research... "gathering information about http://www.w3.org/ because they are writing a news article about W3C's new look web site as an example of excellent web design" Can we get the discussion to include more of that sort thing, please? I'm sorry if I sound like some sort of marketing person, but, well, marketing is a big part of getting a technology deployed. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ see you at the WWW2004 in NY 17-22 May?
Received on Thursday, 18 March 2004 12:54:49 UTC