- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:56:00 +0200
- To: "ext Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Mar 18, 2004, at 02:00, ext Dan Connolly wrote: > > > Please send corrections in reply to this message, > to the whole list; we'll approve the record, with > any corrections/ammendments, at our next meeting. > > If you reply to this message about anything other > than correctly recording the meeting, please > *change the subject*. > > On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 16:08, Dan Connolly wrote: >> 1. Convene, take roll, review agenda >> >> Wednesday, 17 March >> 5:00pm-6:30pm/22:00-23:30 UTC (probably less than 90min) >> Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 7333 ("RDFD") >> http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar.html#s_1316 >> >> for a list of expected particpants, see >> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/#who > > Attendees were DanC, AndyS, DanielK, KendalC, RobS, EricP, > AlbertoR, DaveB, BryanT, DirkG, JosD, DirkC > > regrets: JanneS, KevinW I also sent my regrets (though to DanC personally, not to the list) > >> I'd like a volunteer to scribe. > > Thanks, Andy, for taking notes during the call. > > http://www.w3.org/2004/03/17-dawg-irc > > For this first meeting, I'm sending an edited summary of > the meeting, to set an example of the sort of balance > I'd like to see between a record that's easy to produce > and one that's useful for the group, including (a) people > who weren't on the call and (b) people looking at this > record many months from now. > In the future, I'd like the scribe to send the proposed > minutes for review. > > > >> 2. Upcoming teleconferences >> >> Based 6 responses to the survey >> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/ttime/results >> >> I propose we meet >> Thu 15:30UTC (10:30am Boston / 00:30am Tokyo / 16:30 Paris) >> thru the 1st face to face meeting. In particular, >> 25 Mar, 1 Apr, 8 Apr, 15 Apr. > > so RESOLVED. > > KendallC offered to scribe the next meeting, 25 March. > > postscript: > ACTION DanC: reserve a teleconference bridge > for 25 Mar, 1 Apr, 8 Apr, 15 Apr > (ericp, bonus points if you beat me to it.) > >> 3. Face-to-face meeting >> >> PROPOSED: to meet 22-23 April 2004 in Amsterdam, >> asemantics to host >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JanMar/ >> 0037.html > > so RESOLVED, RobS abstaining. > > There was some discussion of logistics details. > > ACTION DirkG: collect logistics details in a web page and > send us a pointer > > ACTION DanC: set up meeting registration > (ericp, bonus points if you beat me to it) > >> 4. Use Cases >> >> I hope to find one or more that several WG members find appealing, >> and work on refining them further. > > We tried to find, among the use cases that had been sent, those > that were appealing to several of us and hence merited further > development. In response to a request to discuss structure, > DanC asked that we find one or two specific cases before > looking for a general structure. DanC reiterated the qualities > he suggested the group should be looking for in use cases: > > [[ > The ideal use cases will > > -- command consensus of this Working Group > as a description of a problem we intend > to solve (or: solve a part of) > > -- clarify one or more requitements > > -- still be relevant when we're at last call, > deciding whether we think the spec is done > > -- engage potential users of our technology > and convince some of them to closely > review our spec > > -- be clear and engaging enough to > get picked up by journalists and copied > into trade press stories > ]] > -- > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JanMar/ > 0009.html > > A few offers to elaborate on specific cases were accepted: > > ACTION KendallC: refine JS-1, esp the composer/creator version > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JanMar/ > 0025.html > > Note: this is on the boundary of the charter, which says.. "This > may in practice be the virtual graph which would follow from > some form of inference from a stored graph. This does not affect > the data access protocol" > http://www.w3.org/2003/12/swa/dawg-charter#rdfs-owl-queries > > ACTION AndyS: refine AFS-1: "Find the resource for the person called > 'John S mith'" with some details > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JanMar/ > 0023.html > > ACTION EricP: send "tell me properties of X" case > > ACTION AlbertoS: elaborate on AFS-2 "Tell me about ..." > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JanMar/ > 0022.html > > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > see you at the WWW2004 in NY 17-22 May? > > -- Patrick Stickler Nokia, Finland patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Thursday, 18 March 2004 02:58:02 UTC