- From: Janne Saarela <janne.saarela@profium.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 22:27:35 +0200
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
> Meanwhile, we're treading on the boundaries of our charter, > which says that the access mechanism is orthogonal to > the inference capabilities of the service... Good point. JS-1 use case does not require any type of inference from the server. I think the use case needs to be augmented with wording 'the server may or may not support' the inference via 'rdfs:subPropertyOf'. However, my use case says the client can explicitly say if the return vocabulary can be other than the one used to make the request. Janne -- Janne Saarela <janne.saarela@profium.com> Profium, Lars Sonckin kaari 12, 02600 Espoo, Finland Tel. +358 (0)9 855 98 000 Fax. +358 (0)9 855 98 002 Mob. +358 (0)40 508 4767 Internet: http://www.profium.com
Received on Thursday, 11 March 2004 15:27:44 UTC