- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:13:12 -0400
- To: Alberto Reggiori <alberto@asemantics.com>
- Cc: "'Asemantics Staff'" <staff@asemantics.com>, RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 12:57:28AM +0200, Alberto Reggiori wrote: > RDQL. And what it is not contemplated in the current BRQL syntax can be > most probably be expressed using ad-hoc AND constraints or extension > functions. I didn't mean to cause anyone concern or consternation over the "dialect" descriptor. I was trying to quickly summarize a lot of discussion and I thought "dialect" was more accurate than "variant". I think the main point is that the message I included in the summary contains interesting, relevant information. I'll change the "dialect" bit if I update the document. Kendall
Received on Monday, 28 June 2004 19:24:39 UTC