- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 09:51:26 +0100
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Dave, Good idea to make the wording allow for any result sequence form. The re-wording is good as well. Andy -------- Original Message -------- > From: Dave Beckett <> > Date: 9 June 2004 15:02 > > On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 13:51:55 +0100 , "Seaborne, Andy" > <andy.seaborne@hp.com> wrote: > > > > 3.? Streamable Results Format for Variable Binding Results > > > > When returning Variable Binding Results (aref: #r3.2), there must be > > a form of the protocol that allows streaming of results. In this > > form, the results must be returned to the client so that all the data > > for one binding of the variables is available before data for the > > next binding of variables is started. > > Could this not be generalised to just talk about results (or result > sequences, or result sets)? This would cover returning multiple > graphs IF that was decided as a result format. > > Let me try a rewrite: > > 3.? Streamable Results > > When returning multiple results there must be a form of the protocol > that allows streaming of results. In this form, the results must be > returned to the client so that all the data in one result are > available before all the data for the next result. > > Optional addition: > This does not require an ordering of results but that each result > is available one at a time. > > <snip/> > > Dave
Received on Friday, 11 June 2004 05:08:07 UTC