Re: agenda: RDF Data Access WG telcon 11 May

On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 11:16:23 +0100, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> Steve,
> 
> Would dropping that last part make it acceptable [1]: I don't think it met
> with much support:

Yes, that would be fine as far as I'm concerned.
 
> - - - - - - - - - - - 
> 3.4 Subgraph Results
> 
> It must be possible to select an entailed subgraph of a queried graph.  In
> this case, the results are themselves an RDF graph.
> - - - - - - - - - - - 
> 
> 
> I'd like to get help with the term "entailed" here - it is just my
> understanding of how to view virtual triples as a possible RDF graph
> satisfying the (not directly visible) abox/tbox.
> 
> Maybe s/an entailed of/a/

Modulo this, I'm not sure what entailed implies here.

- Steve