- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 11:52:31 +0100
- To: "'RDF Data Access Working Group'" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 11:16:23 +0100, Seaborne, Andy wrote: > Steve, > > Would dropping that last part make it acceptable [1]: I don't think it met > with much support: Yes, that would be fine as far as I'm concerned. > - - - - - - - - - - - > 3.4 Subgraph Results > > It must be possible to select an entailed subgraph of a queried graph. In > this case, the results are themselves an RDF graph. > - - - - - - - - - - - > > > I'd like to get help with the term "entailed" here - it is just my > understanding of how to view virtual triples as a possible RDF graph > satisfying the (not directly visible) abox/tbox. > > Maybe s/an entailed of/a/ Modulo this, I'm not sure what entailed implies here. - Steve
Received on Tuesday, 11 May 2004 06:52:34 UTC