RE: requirement: rdfs query (for lack of a better name...)

OK Rob, sounds fine...
(will sleep over it once more :))
sounds like a separation of concerns

-- 
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/




"Rob Shearer" <Rob.Shearer@networkinference.com>
07/05/2004 01:55

 
        To:     Jos De_Roo/AMDUS/MOR/Agfa-NV/BE/BAYER@AGFA
        cc:     <kendall@monkeyfist.com>, <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>, 
<public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org>
        Subject:        RE: requirement: rdfs query (for lack of a better name...)


I'm suggesting that an RDF query language should not specify that the
triple

:Tony a :SEAFOOD

exists. It's RDFS's job (or OWL's job, or SWRL's job, or something) to
specify that.
I'm suggesting that if there is some server sitting somewhere which
happens to know this fact somehow (whether it derived it from RDF+RDFS
or from somewhere else), then you should be able to query it.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jos De_Roo [mailto:jos.deroo@agfa.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 4:36 PM
> To: Rob Shearer
> Cc: kendall@monkeyfist.com; public-rdf-dawg@w3.org; 
> public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org
> Subject: RE: requirement: rdfs query (for lack of a better name...)
> 
> 
> RobS wrote:
> [...]
> > Let's leave derived graphs and inferencing to working 
> groups that know
> > how to address them and confine ourselves to representing queries
> > against the data model which underlies it all.
> 
> Rob, I'm completely confused, do you really mean that one
> can't query
> 
> :Tony a :CRAB.
> :CRAB rdfs:subClassOf :SEAFOOD.
> 
> to get an answer like
> 
> :Tony a :SEAFOOD
> 
> ??
> (if no, then I go to bed... :)) 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
>

Received on Thursday, 6 May 2004 20:03:43 UTC