Re: Requirement on XSD datatypes

Andy, I agree with your rewording

[[
3.7 Support for XSD Datatypes

The query language design must identify a set of XSD datatypes and
operations on these datatypes.  Test case of queries involving datatype
operations will be developed.
]]

-- 
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/




"Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Sent by: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org
06/05/2004 19:00

 
        To:     RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
        cc: 
        Subject:        Requirement on XSD datatypes



The current requirements section is a list of "candidate requirements" not 
a
complete list of all we will cover.  Rather than requirement 3.7, which
names calls out date and time datatypes, I suggest we include a 
requirement
to identify a core set of XSD datatypes that implementations will support. 
 

At the F2F, we had just before the date/time requirement:

"""
 * Queries supporting datatypes xsd:integer and xsd:float with operations:
less than, equal, greater than [DATATYPES-IF]
"""

which we didn't explicitly vote on (its not recorded anyway).

I am neutral as to whether we should identify any datatypes now.  If it is 
a
matter of debate, let's not and leave space for a debate, including 
liaising
with other groups.  If we do identify some datatypes now, and I'm not an 
XSD
expert, I suggest some numeric types and string at least.  Maybe a mention
of date/time.  (I would prefer to see date/time in the final 
recommendation
as users ask for them but date/time is not trivial.)

Suggestion:

----------------------------------

3.7 Support for XSD Datatypes

The query language design must identify a set of XSD datatypes and
operations on these datatypes.  Test case of queries involving datatype
operations will be developed.

----------------------------------

Received on Thursday, 6 May 2004 17:38:02 UTC