- From: Howard Katz <howardk@fatdog.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 11:08:25 -0700
- To: "Rob Shearer" <Rob.Shearer@networkinference.com>, "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>, "RDF Data Access Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Agreed it is putting the cart before the horse from one perspective. Another possiblity is to move a BOF to the Friday, assuming (probably optimistically) that people haven't already made plans to depart at that point. I realize we do have an hour of back-and-forth following each set of talks, and that might be enough to fuel some useful follow-up discussions via email. Any consensus? Good idea? Bad idea? Strong opinions one way or another ... ? Howard > -----Original Message----- > From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Rob Shearer > Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 10:40 AM > To: Howard Katz; Seaborne, Andy; RDF Data Access Working Group > Subject: RE: Supplemental XQuery reading list > > > > > On a different but related topic, since we don't have time > > allocated for it > > on the agenda, would anyone be interested in a BOF for a > > freeform discussion > > on XQuery/RDF on the Thursday evening say (after a nice day > > of getting to > > know one and other and a pleasant dinner)? Personally, I > > generally get more > > questions answered in one hour of face-to-face than in two or > > three weeks of > > email and/or blindly stumbling around the web. > > Unfortunately, I believe that all the lightning talks are scheduled for > Friday, so we won't have a common foundation for discussion on Thursday > night. (Thus my comment earlier that we certainly won't be ready for > language discussions immediately, because we won't have time to actually > discuss them much at the face-to-face.) > > If we think this is really important, I suppose we could consider moving > the first round of lightning talks to Thursday, but it seems a bit late > in the process to do this. >
Received on Friday, 16 April 2004 14:07:14 UTC