W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2004

RE: Supplemental XQuery reading list

From: Howard Katz <howardk@fatdog.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 11:08:25 -0700
To: "Rob Shearer" <Rob.Shearer@networkinference.com>, "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>, "RDF Data Access Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

Agreed it is putting the cart before the horse from one perspective. Another
possiblity is to move a BOF to the Friday, assuming (probably
optimistically) that people haven't already made plans to depart at that
point. I realize we do have an hour of back-and-forth following each set of
talks, and that might be enough to fuel some useful follow-up discussions
via email.

Any consensus? Good idea? Bad idea? Strong opinions one way or another ... ?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Rob Shearer
> Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 10:40 AM
> To: Howard Katz; Seaborne, Andy; RDF Data Access Working Group
> Subject: RE: Supplemental XQuery reading list
> > On a different but related topic, since we don't have time
> > allocated for it
> > on the agenda, would anyone be interested in a BOF for a
> > freeform discussion
> > on XQuery/RDF on the Thursday evening say (after a nice day
> > of getting to
> > know one and other and a pleasant dinner)? Personally, I
> > generally get more
> > questions answered in one hour of face-to-face than in two or
> > three weeks of
> > email and/or blindly stumbling around the web.
> Unfortunately, I believe that all the lightning talks are scheduled for
> Friday, so we won't have a common foundation for discussion on Thursday
> night. (Thus my comment earlier that we certainly won't be ready for
> language discussions immediately, because we won't have time to actually
> discuss them much at the face-to-face.)
> If we think this is really important, I suppose we could consider moving
> the first round of lightning talks to Thursday, but it seems a bit late
> in the process to do this.
Received on Friday, 16 April 2004 14:07:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:00:26 UTC