- From: Rob Shearer <Rob.Shearer@networkinference.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 12:30:46 -0800
- To: <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I'd like some clarification of just what we're trying to get at from this requirement. Are we saying that we want queries to fit into the RDF/XML syntax? I'd like clarification on just what users and use cases benefit from such a syntax. My experience is that forcing RDF/XML syntax just makes it damn near impossible for humans to compose a document without lots of help from tools. If queries are being generated automatically, most software systems are pretty agnostic just what their output syntax is, so I don't see RDF representations as helping them much, either. Are we saying that we want queries to fit the RDF data model? If so, I don't think it's met trivially, since just about anything can be translated into RDF--that's the whole point of RDF. Or are we saying that given some chunk of RDF, there should be some sensible query connotation that it invokes? Is this a roundabout way of getting back to entailment as an independent query--i.e. here's some RDF; does it necessarily follow from the source I'm querying?
Received on Thursday, 1 April 2004 15:33:23 UTC