Re: SPARQL 1.1 Federated Query - 2.4 Interplay of SERVICE and VALUES (Informative) showing wrong example

Hi, folks --

In the Errata --

   https://www.w3.org/2013/sparql-errata#sparql11-federated-query

-- for "SPARQL 1.1 Federated Query" --

   https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-federated-query/#values

-- I found reference to this --

   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2013Apr/0007.html

> From: Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca> 
> Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 15:54:59 +0200
> Message-ID: <517D2A33.5040208@csarven.ca> 
> To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org 
> CC: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
> 
> The last queryGroup example at [1] is not the right example (missing 
> VALUES).
> 
> [1] 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-federated-query/#values


I wonder if the Errata could be updated to include the example
query that's missing from the TR?

Thanks,

Ted


--
A: Yes.                          http://www.idallen.com/topposting.html
| Q: Are you sure?           
| | A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
| | | Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

Ted Thibodeau, Jr.           //               voice +1-781-273-0900 x32
Senior Support & Evangelism  //        mailto:tthibodeau@openlinksw.com
                             //              http://twitter.com/TallTed
OpenLink Software, Inc.      //              http://www.openlinksw.com/
         20 Burlington Mall Road, Suite 322, Burlington MA 01803
     Weblog    -- http://www.openlinksw.com/blogs/
     Community -- https://community.openlinksw.com/
     LinkedIn  -- http://www.linkedin.com/company/openlink-software/
     Twitter   -- http://twitter.com/OpenLink
     Google+   -- http://plus.google.com/100570109519069333827/
     Facebook  -- http://www.facebook.com/OpenLinkSoftware
Universal Data Access, Integration, and Management Technology Providers