- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:10:07 -0700
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
errata-query-8 suggests that variables that occur only in embedded EXISTS should not be processed by substitute. According to the example in Section 8.3.3 PREFIX : <http://example.com/> SELECT * WHERE { ?x :p ?n FILTER NOT EXISTS { ?x :q ?m . FILTER(?n = ?m) } } variables in embedded FILTERS are to be substituted, so the exclusion is only going to be for variables in EXISTS inside inner FILTERS, as in PREFIX : <http://example.com/> SELECT * WHERE { ?x :p ?n FILTER NOT EXISTS { ?x :q ?m . FILTER EXISTS{ ?n :s ?m } } } where the substitution is not done for the inner ?n but is done for the inner ?m. This difference in treatment does not appear to have any rationale. There is also no discussion of this case in the supporting discussion at https://gist.github.com/kasei/2543d93652016e0bb860 This part of the erratum should be removed. Peter F. Patel-Schneider Nuance Communications
Received on Thursday, 23 June 2016 22:10:39 UTC