- From: Jeremy J Carroll <jjc@syapse.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 08:53:06 -0700
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
- Message-Id: <871C7DA3-0F8F-47DB-B211-644F5238025C@syapse.com>
This is a formal comment on section 17.1 or SPARQL 1.1 Query http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-sparql11-query-20130321/#operandDataTypes <http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-sparql11-query-20130321/#operandDataTypes> I was recently disappointed that xsd:date was not in the first list of supported datatypes (for casting), i.e. xsd:integer <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028/#dt-integer> xsd:decimal <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028/#dt-decimal> xsd:float <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028/#dt-float> xsd:double <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028/#dt-double> xsd:string <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028/#dt-string> xsd:boolean <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028/#dt-boolean> xsd:dateTime <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028/#dt-dateTime> I am using strdt() as a workaround. When this recommendation is next reviewed I request that this list be expanded (at least to include xsd:date), but maybe to include all primitive datatypes (perhaps except xsd:duration which is specifically difficult) Jeremy
Received on Monday, 26 October 2015 15:53:38 UTC