- From: Jeen Broekstra <jeen.broekstra@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 15:20:24 +1200
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
On 27/07/13 20:56, Esko Nuutila wrote: > Thanks Andy, > > So there is no error in Section 18, and the idea is that the relative > order of BGPs and OPTIONALs within the same group graph pattern can have > an effect on the solutions and an implementation should not reorder them? > > It seems that there is an error in Sesame OpenRDF Workbench. I had a quick look and can confirm that there is a parser bug in Sesame that causes this discrepancy. Issue logged at https://openrdf.atlassian.net/browse/SES-1898 . Jeen
Received on Monday, 29 July 2013 03:20:54 UTC