- From: james anderson <james.anderson@setf.de>
- Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:44:12 +0200
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 22 August 2013 10:44:46 UTC
good afternoon; On 22 Aug 2013, at 11:45 AM, Steve Harris wrote: > On 21 Aug 2013, at 18:09, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote: > >>>>> [...] >> >> I agree : zero=> "" and one => the one argument. >> >> This would make CONCAT like GROUP_CONCAT. > > OK, that would make sense then. > > What does STR() return? If that's "" as well, then I think it's pretty clear that's the right answer. str does not permit a variable number of arguments. > >> It is worth defining as cases >> >> CONCAT() -> "" >> CONCAT("abc") -> "abc" >> and the fn:concat for the other cases so as not to redefine "fn:concat" >> >> GROUP_CONCAT already gets this right. best regards, from berlin,
Received on Thursday, 22 August 2013 10:44:46 UTC