- From: james anderson <james.anderson@setf.de>
- Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:44:12 +0200
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 22 August 2013 10:44:46 UTC
good afternoon;
On 22 Aug 2013, at 11:45 AM, Steve Harris wrote:
> On 21 Aug 2013, at 18:09, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote:
>
>>>>> [...]
>>
>> I agree : zero=> "" and one => the one argument.
>>
>> This would make CONCAT like GROUP_CONCAT.
>
> OK, that would make sense then.
>
> What does STR() return? If that's "" as well, then I think it's pretty clear that's the right answer.
str does not permit a variable number of arguments.
>
>> It is worth defining as cases
>>
>> CONCAT() -> ""
>> CONCAT("abc") -> "abc"
>> and the fn:concat for the other cases so as not to redefine "fn:concat"
>>
>> GROUP_CONCAT already gets this right.
best regards, from berlin,
Received on Thursday, 22 August 2013 10:44:46 UTC