Re: 9.1 Property Path Syntax

Thank you very much for making these clarifications.

I am happy that the working group has responded to my comments.

nick.


On 01/09/2012 21:24, "Andy Seaborne" <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> wrote:

> nick,
> 
> Thank you for your comments on property path syntax. As already
> mentioned, the syntax for IRIs is discussed in section 4.1.1.
> 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#QSynIRI
> 
> I have added a link for the text in section 9.1 "Property Path Syntax"
> at "an IRI written in full or abbreviated by a prefixed name".
> 
> Also, the first example has been given an alternative writing:
> 
> { :book1 <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/title> |
> <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label> ?displayString }
> 
> (it isn't wrapped in the spec)
> 
> I would be grateful if you reply to this message to confirm that the
> working group has responded to your comment.
> 
>      Yours, on behalf of the SPARQL Working Group,
>      Andy
> 
> On 14/08/12 22:28, Nicholas Humfrey wrote:
>> Thanks for clarifying Andy. It makes sense to me now.
>> 
>> Suggestions for clarifications:
>> * Provide a link from the description of property paths in section 9.1
>> to the definition of a SPARQL IRI in section 4.1.1.
>> * Give a property path example showing a IRI written in full.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> nick.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to this.

Received on Monday, 3 September 2012 12:01:17 UTC