- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 13:44:10 +0100
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
On 19/10/12 18:06, Rob Vesse wrote:
> In reviewing the latest state of the test suite I've spotted a couple of
> tests that appear to be incorrect
>
> * syntax-update-1/syntax-update-bad-02.ru
> * syntax-update-1/syntax-update-bad-03.ru
Are we looking at the same thing:
I see:
syntax-update-1/syntax-update-bad-02.ru ==>
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/syntax-update-1/syntax-update-bad-02.ru
-----
# Typo in keyword.
CREATE DEAFULT
-----
and syntax-update-1/syntax-update-bad-03.ru ==>
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/syntax-update-1/syntax-update-bad-03.ru
-----
# Variable in data.
DELETE DATA { ?s <p> <o> }
-----
both of which are bad syntax.
Andy
>
> Both of these tests are negative syntax tests checking for a prologue
> only update being forbidden, according to the current grammar a prologue
> only update is acceptable. I did some digging and the grammar which
> forbade this was last present in the Oct 2010 working draft. The May
> 2011 working draft changed the grammar to allow for prologue only
> updates and prologue only updates have been allowed by all subsequent
> drafts.
>
> Please can the working group change these tests to be positive syntax
> tests to reflect the fact that the grammar now permits this
>
> Regards,
>
> Rob Vesse
Received on Monday, 22 October 2012 12:44:39 UTC